Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Post crit thoughts..


I presented this conceptual sketch as how I want my building to look like, with the undulating-patterned glass facade along the residential floors to Michelle.  My floor plans needs major reworking so I didnt post them  because I'm embaressed of them I still have issues with dead end hallways and theyre going to drastically change soon. She didn't seem too impressed or comment much on the massing of the building, other than that I could consider pushing and pulling in some walls.

The idea of "verticality" was the driving force towards only having vertical mullions, and just spiders / sealant instead of horizontal mullions. She pointed out that if verticality was my concept, perhaps I could have one of the "senses" react to it (auditory maybe? with a floor to roof atrium?)

Also, what are your comments on going over the 20m zoning restriction? I'm having difficulty comfortably fitting all units + a good common / residential third space I want under 20m, and I feel a better design would come out if I went 25m.


1 comment:

  1. -get the Building Codes Illustrated book as soon as possible; it will prove to be indispensable as you proceed into the rest of the term; lectures can only achieve so much; the book illustrates the fundamentals of IBC so you can understand them in your own work
    -I am not certain about really getting the "verticality" through the mullions alone; remember that the overall mass remains more "boxy" than tall and "vertical"
    -not sure about the floor to roof atrium as it might be a compliance issue depending on the design; going beyond the 20m height limit is fine so long as you acknowledge that you would be going for amendment/application; it happens all the time
    -with respect to the sensory connections with verticality, perhaps it is a reinforcing of distance by having masses/floors sink below grade such that the view at those subterranean (read: dark and potentially conducive to projection) areas up a high double height space from grade would be dramatized; it is difficult to imagine verticality conveyed without sight as the other senses would allude to volumes rather than height; if you are going for echo/acoustic connections, you might be sidestepping the issue; perhaps it is simply a matter of emphasizing distance (i.e. vertical distance); for example you could be removing the elements from the street as you move up in the building; I wouldn't wrap my head around too many ways to add gimmicks to address all the senses on this
    -just the potential of even an elevator connecting to the outside condition highlights verticality; not only does one taking an elevator looking out get a sense of the vertical transition, but the people on the street would visually trace the path an elevator makes up the face of the building (think CN tower)

    ReplyDelete